Adventures in Swimsuit Shopping…
>> 31 May 2009
Okay, I am going to vent. I went shopping today for a new swimsuit for Kaitlyn, the 5 year old. She has a few from last year but they are getting a little small and faded and I wanted to get her a 2 piece swimsuit like the one she had last year. It was super cute—a pink “tankini” with hearts. Perfect. Well, apparently Summer 2009 is all about the teensy weensy itty bitty bikini. I couldn’t find a decent girl's tankini anywhere. I went to Target and all they had were one pieces (she has a new one) and really skimpy bikinis. Ugh. Come on. I don’t want my kid wearing a string bikini. My goodness. Yes, I know she’s 5 and has no idea why I don’t like them. She thinks they are cute and she wants to look like Sharpay from High School Musical or Barbie. Not surprising.
I ended up at Old Navy and browsed their selection. They were on sale ($10!) but to be honest, they were mostly skimpy. And, worse---the tops had PADDING in them. What!? Why would a little girl need padding in her bikini top? Who’s bright idea is this? I was appalled at this and I am not exactly a conservative person by nature either. But still, I was so upset. I ended up buying her a 2 piece with a bikini-ish top and boy-shorts (above). No padding. It’s cute. It was one of the only non-padded swimsuits I could find.
I guess that stores want to sell clothes that are in style, trendy, and sellable. But, really. What will padding do to these swimsuits besides give these young girls a distorted body image at the age of 5? What am I supposed to tell Kaitlyn if she asks what the padding is for? Ick. I just don’t want to get those images in her head.
I am probably just being irrational. I was just really thrown by this and wondered if anyone else had the same experience. Have you?
![]()








